Stories on the edge of familiarity
Why Stephanie Meyer is a Truly Great Writer

Why Stephanie Meyer is a Truly Great Writer

Yesterday, I read Eve by William Paul Young, the author of The Shack, and it taught me something I will never forget.

Reading as an author different than reading as a reader – when you’re a writer, you don’t read to read. You read to learn. You read to gain a better grasp on story, to discover ways to improve your work by following or not following the example of the author you’re reading.

So what struck me all through reading Eve was that, despite character voices that don’t always ring true, the author’s voice sneaking into the characters’ dialogue, almost no sense of setting or action, and the feel that it was more in the vein of a philosopher’s dialogue with plot than a novel, one thing remained certain with every single word:

No-one can do what William Paul Young does.

This isn’t some theoretical position about the uniqueness of what each person creates, although that assertion is true. This is the fullness of that idea made manifest in his writing. No matter what material it pulls from, the existence of Eve requires the existence of William Paul Young.

What William Paul Young and Stephanie Meyer Have in Common

Before I could put this into words, all I had was a feeling: this emotional connection I’d made to both Eve and The Shack despite the many weaknesses of the writing. I considered the kinds of reactions The Shack got, the criticisms of its detractors, who mainly focused on the details of its content and writing quality, contrasted with the praises of its supporters, who mainly focused on their connection to the story and what they had gained from it. It reminded me of how people have responded to the Twilight series and The Host.

Now, I haven’t read the Twilight series, so I can’t comment on it, but I have read The Host. It had some borderline disturbing relationship dynamics (with a few beyond borderline disturbing moments), about twice the dialogue it needed, and the sense that almost every solution to the story’s problems was too easy.

And yet, it comes down to the same thing as Eve: No-one, past, present, and future, can do what Stephanie Meyer does.

While the fact that each person is unique and does things in a way that no-one else can do them is true, both William Paul Young and Stephanie Meyer make it utterly clear that this is true of them. They do not hide behind trying to be someone else, or less than who they are. They are William Paul Young and Stephanie Meyer and they know it.

Truly Great Writers Know Their Value

Being a truly great writer doesn’t require impeccable prose, beautiful language, and views that are universally palatable or praiseworthy.

It simply requires the writer know their value so deeply that it comes through every word they write.

This is mistaken for arrogance when we are mired in the belief that we are less than who we are. We cry to those who know their value to have some humility.

But arrogance is a form of pride, and pride is when we lie about who we are. Which means humility is telling the truth about who we are. Which means that, when we say we are less than who we are, we are being just as prideful as when we say we are more.

Does this mean that a truly great writer is perfect and always knows their value? No. We are all flawed, after all.

But both William Paul Young and Stephanie Meyer, like Charles Dickens, J.R.R. Tolkein, Margaret Atwood, Ursula Le Guin, C.S. Lewis, Madeleine L’Engle, Frank Herbert, and a host of others, are writers who get up eight times for every seven times they fall.

We may criticize how they do what they do. We may criticize the roughness of their writing, or that they didn’t play to our tastes or beliefs.

But, when it comes down to it, they know their value and their books are imbued with it.

The only way to escape that is to pretend they don’t exist.

That’s my thought on the subject. Leave a comment to say what yours are.

This post is a part of the Bravery Blogging Project, a challenge for bloggers to write about IDEAS: original, deep, and real perspectives, stories, or lessons.

To eschew the fear of unsubscribes and negative reactions and to say what we really think.

For more of the work in this challenge, search the hashtag #braveblogging or click on the image to the left.

8 Responses to Why Stephanie Meyer is a Truly Great Writer

  1. Well said, Thea. I like this #braveblogging thing. Great excuse to say the things we’ve been wanting to say. Great way to practice the kind of courage that should be part of everything we do. I hope more bloggers get on board and post things they’ve been wanting to say.

    • Same. I think we’d be surprised (and more pleasantly than we might expect!) if more people said what they actually think, especially online. We seem to think the most honest people online are also the worst people, but I think that is the farthest thing from the truth.

  2. As for Stephanie Meyer (and your example of William Paul Young), their writing obviously touches a chord somewhere deep and in a lot of people. We can critique the craft all we want, but the proof of effective writing is in the readers and those books have a lot a lot a lot of proof.

    Bashing those authors for how they write is like bashing Charles Schulz because Peanuts isn’t “fine art” done in oils on a canvas. Fine art was never the goal. Telling a story that would touch people’s hearts was the goal.

    I’m glad to see someone standing up to say it.

    • Charles Schulz is such a good example! His art may not be Michelangelo… but then Michelangelo wouldn’t have been able to make Peanuts. And a world without Peanuts would be a poorer one.

      As Bill Watterson pointed out in a strip of Calvin and Hobbes, this whole “low art” and “high art” divide is absurd, to say the least. Man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart.

  3. I think many writers have a hard time separating the medium from the message. Novels, plays, graphic novels, TV shows, campfire tales, and more are all vehicles for conveying stories. The craft of good prose writing is not necessarily the same as the craft of good storytelling.

    Stephanie Meyer and other bestsellers have obviously written stories that resonate with large numbers of people. I think it’s worth exploring just what it is that fans love about their works and see if that is something that matches our artistic vision and learn from it.

    • Yes, seeing if what they do is something that matches our artistic vision is key. Just because someone with problems in terms of the art of prose writes a novel that is wildly successful doesn’t mean that we must all sacrifice our standards of quality for prose in order to also be successful, or that’s the only way we’ll be able to find the success we want. If that were the case, people wouldn’t be buying anything by Tolkien or Madeleine L’Engle anymore.

      I may have respect for Stephanie Meyer, but I’m not going to write prose like her. I’d much rather write prose like me. It’s an aesthetic I like better. :)